T400 4 GB vs Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
2.07

T400 4 GB outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 363% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking882464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.45
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores862384
Core clock speed685 / 600 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3,GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−347%
85−90
+347%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Fortnite 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Valorant 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−350%
180−190
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Dota 2 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Fortnite 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Dota 2 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Valorant 35−40
−362%
180−190
+362%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Valorant 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%
Valorant 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • T400 4 GB is 347% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 9.59
Recency 15 May 2012 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

T400 4 GB has a 363.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The T400 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 93 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 61 vote

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics or T400 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.