Radeon RX 6400 vs HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with Radeon RX 6400, including specs and performance data.

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
2.10

RX 6400 outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking875279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.10
Power efficiencyno data25.66
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores862768
Core clock speed685 / 600 MHz1923 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2321 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data53 Watt
Texture fill rateno data111.4
Floating-point processing powerno data3.565 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3,GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−789%
160−170
+789%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Hitman 3 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Hitman 3 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Hitman 3 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−800%
90−95
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−817%
110−120
+817%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−733%
300−310
+733%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Hitman 3 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−809%
100−105
+809%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RX 6400 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6400 is 789% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 19.82
Recency 15 May 2012 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm

RX 6400 has a 843.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1980 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.