Radeon RX 6300M vs HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
2.10

RX 6300M outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 694% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking875328
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data32.68
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores862768
Core clock speed685 / 600 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data115.2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.686 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3,GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−678%
140−150
+678%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−650%
60−65
+650%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−650%
30−33
+650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6300M is 678% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics surpassed RX 6300M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 16.67
Recency 15 May 2012 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm

RX 6300M has a 693.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 433.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 85 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7660G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.