Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics with Radeon Pro Vega 48, including specs and performance data.
Pro 48 outperforms HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1277% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 925 | 239 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | no data | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 19 March 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 862 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 685 / 600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 249.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 192 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3,GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 786 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 402.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1.125 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19
−1268%
| 260−270
+1268%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1182%
|
500−550
+1182%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−1275%
|
550−600
+1275%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−1264%
|
300−310
+1264%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1182%
|
500−550
+1182%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−1264%
|
300−310
+1264%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−1257%
|
95−100
+1257%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1264%
|
150−160
+1264%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1182%
|
500−550
+1182%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1233%
|
120−130
+1233%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−1257%
|
190−200
+1257%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
−1268%
|
260−270
+1268%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
−1257%
|
190−200
+1257%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1200%
|
65−70
+1200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1233%
|
200−210
+1233%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−1200%
|
130−140
+1200%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
This is how HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and Pro Vega 48 compete in popular games:
- Pro Vega 48 is 1268% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.85 | 25.48 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 19 March 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Pro Vega 48 has a 1277.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 48 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
