HD Graphics 400 vs Radeon HD 7660D

Place in performance ranking	993	1041
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.03	no data
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Trinity	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2012 (11 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$122	no data
Current price	$41 (0.3x MSRP)	$710

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 7660D and HD Graphics 400 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	96
Core clock speed	633 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	640 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.20	7.680
Floating-point performance	no data	134.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	IGP	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.3
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7660D 1.30
+16.1%

HD Graphics 400 1.12

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 16% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7660D 997
+122%

HD Graphics 400 450

Radeon HD 7660D outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 122% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

19
+18.8%

16−18

−18.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Hitman 3	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
+100%

1−2

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2	0−1
Metro Exodus	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how HD 7660D and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

HD 7660D is 19% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.30	1.12
Recency	26 September 2012	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	6 Watt