Radeon RX 6800 XT vs HD 7650M

Place in the ranking	1077	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	52.76
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Thames	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2012 (12 years ago)	28 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	4608
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	550 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	648.0
Floating-point processing power	0.432 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	128
TMUs	24	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7650M 1.15

RX 6800 XT 64.89
+5543%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7650M 442

RX 6800 XT 25028
+5562%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7650M 4563

RX 6800 XT 96516
+2015%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7650M 946

RX 6800 XT 52046
+5405%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7650M 700

RX 6800 XT 49735
+7005%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18 −5456%	1000−1050 +5456%
Full HD	20 −915%	203 +915%
1440p	2−3 −6600%	134 +6600%
4K	1−2 −8500%	86 +8500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−4067%

120−130
+4067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2580%	130−140 +2580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2800%	110−120 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4067%	120−130 +4067%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −5133%	150−160 +5133%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −23200%	230−240 +23200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2540%	132 +2540%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1746%	240−250 +1746%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −6000%	122 +6000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3729%	260−270 +3729%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −866%	309 +866%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2580%	130−140 +2580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2800%	110−120 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4067%	120−130 +4067%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −5133%	150−160 +5133%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −23200%	230−240 +23200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2620%	136 +2620%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1746%	240−250 +1746%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5850%	110−120 +5850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4971%	355 +4971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1145%	130−140 +1145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −866%	309 +866%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2580%	130−140 +2580%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2800%	110−120 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4067%	120−130 +4067%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −11400%	110−120 +11400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −23200%	230−240 +23200%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2340%	122 +2340%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −2046%	279 +2046%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4214%	302 +4214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1355%	160 +1355%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −250%	112 +250%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−5900%

120
+5900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −14800%	140−150 +14800%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −5000%	100−110 +5000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −7500%	75−80 +7500%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1529%	114 +1529%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −5275%	215 +5275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	110−120
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −6180%	314 +6180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2800%

116
+2800%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

60−65

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −5100%	50−55 +5100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	65
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	45−50
Far Cry 5	0−1	45−50

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3700%

76
+3700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	158 +0%	158 +0%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	135 +0%	135 +0%
Battlefield 5	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

118

+0%

118

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 +0%	98 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 +0%	222 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Hitman 3	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	126 +0%	126 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110 +0%	110 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +0%	133 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	49 +0%	49 +0%

This is how HD 7650M and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 5456% faster in 900p
RX 6800 XT is 915% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 6600% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 8500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 23200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.15	64.89
Recency	7 January 2012	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	300 Watt

HD 7650M has 1400% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 5542.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.