GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7650M and GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7650M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 20 Watt
1.03

RTX 5060 Mobile outperforms HD 7650M by a whopping 4185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking111992
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.9274.55
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameThamesGB206
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)20 May 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4803328
Core clock speed450 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed550 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors716 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80151.3
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS9.684 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs24104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7650M 1.03
RTX 5060 Mobile 44.14
+4185%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7650M 438
RTX 5060 Mobile 18697
+4169%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7650M 946
RTX 5060 Mobile 41341
+4272%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7650M 4563
RTX 5060 Mobile 81794
+1693%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7650M 700
RTX 5060 Mobile 33007
+4615%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18
−4067%
750−800
+4067%
Full HD19
−337%
83
+337%
1440p1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
100−110
+5250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
100−110
+5250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−14100%
140−150
+14100%
Fortnite 2−3
−9500%
190−200
+9500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2767%
170−180
+2767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
Valorant 30−35
−713%
250−260
+713%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−973%
270−280
+973%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
100−110
+5250%
Dota 2 14−16
−3900%
600−650
+3900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−14100%
140−150
+14100%
Fortnite 2−3
−9500%
190−200
+9500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2767%
170−180
+2767%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2700%
160−170
+2700%
Valorant 30−35
−713%
250−260
+713%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5250%
100−110
+5250%
Dota 2 14−16
−3900%
600−650
+3900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−14100%
140−150
+14100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2767%
170−180
+2767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2700%
160−170
+2700%
Valorant 30−35
−4094%
1300−1350
+4094%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−9500%
190−200
+9500%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−11900%
120−130
+11900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−5150%
300−350
+5150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−3991%
450−500
+3991%
Valorant 2−3
−14000%
280−290
+14000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6600%
130−140
+6600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 90−95

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−6000%
120−130
+6000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−538%
100−110
+538%
Valorant 5−6
−5300%
270−280
+5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3250%
65−70
+3250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 135
+0%
135
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

This is how HD 7650M and RTX 5060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Mobile is 4067% faster in 900p
  • RTX 5060 Mobile is 337% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Mobile is 4300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5060 Mobile is 14100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Mobile is ahead in 31 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 44.14
Recency 7 January 2012 20 May 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 45 Watt

HD 7650M has 125% lower power consumption.

RTX 5060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4185.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650M
Radeon HD 7650M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 82 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 69 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7650M or GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.