NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon HD 7650A

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

HD 7650A
1.48

Quadro K2000M outperforms Radeon HD 7650A by 76% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking934776
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.230.28
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameOnegaN14P-Q3
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 January 2012 (12 years old)1 June 2012 (11 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$262 $265.27
Current price$46 (0.2x MSRP)$92 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

K2000M has 22% better value for money than HD 7650A.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480384
Core clock speed600 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors716 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4023.84
Floating-point performance576.0 gflops572.2 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7650A and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
WidthMXM Moduleno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A+
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7650A 1.48
K2000M 2.61
+76.4%

Quadro K2000M outperforms Radeon HD 7650A by 76% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7650A 572
K2000M 1013
+77.1%

Quadro K2000M outperforms Radeon HD 7650A by 77% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−78.6%
25
+78.6%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.48 2.61
Recency 5 January 2012 1 June 2012
Cost $262 $265.27
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 55 Watt

The Quadro K2000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7650A in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7650A is a desktop card while Quadro K2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7650A
Radeon HD 7650A
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Quadro K2000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.