UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

Place in the ranking	951	656
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	11.18
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	no data	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	656	48
Core clock speed	655 / 450 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1.64

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.56
+178%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1583

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
+122%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 4981

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
+114%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 663

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321
+250%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 5807

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992
+175%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

32
+77.8%

−77.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−175%

11
+175%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −125%	36 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −88.9%	17 +88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −41.7%	16−18 +41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −117%	12−14 +117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +50%	8 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−300%

12−14
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −250%	27−30 +250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−100%

8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−200%

3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−66.7%

5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +0%	12 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is 78% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is 50% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 460% faster.

All in all, in popular games: