Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.
RX 6750 GRE outperforms HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics by a whopping 2738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 955 | 71 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 43.94 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.80 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | no data | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 17 October 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $549 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 656 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2581 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 250 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 413.0 |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 160 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 18 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 432.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 32
−2713%
| 900−950
+2713%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 0.61 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Elden Ring | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−2700%
|
280−290
+2700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Elden Ring | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Fortnite | 8−9
−2650%
|
220−230
+2650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−2700%
|
280−290
+2700%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−2547%
|
450−500
+2547%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−2650%
|
220−230
+2650%
|
| World of Tanks | 30−35
−2627%
|
900−950
+2627%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Dota 2 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−2700%
|
280−290
+2700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18
−2547%
|
450−500
+2547%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−2700%
|
280−290
+2700%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| World of Tanks | 10−11
−2700%
|
280−290
+2700%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−2713%
|
900−950
+2713%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2733%
|
85−90
+2733%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−2733%
|
170−180
+2733%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2700%
|
140−150
+2700%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−2614%
|
190−200
+2614%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−2713%
|
450−500
+2713%
|
| Elden Ring | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−2650%
|
110−120
+2650%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−2567%
|
400−450
+2567%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−2713%
|
450−500
+2713%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
This is how HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:
- RX 6750 GRE is 2713% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.64 | 46.55 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 17 October 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
RX 6750 GRE has a 2738.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
