ATI Radeon 8500 vs HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics with Radeon 8500, including specs and performance data.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
2012
1.50
+14900%

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms 8500 by a whopping 14900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10131562
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameno dataR200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores656no data
Core clock speed655 / 450 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX118.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 8−9 0−1

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.50 0.01
Recency 15 May 2012 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics has a 14900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 8500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics
ATI Radeon 8500
Radeon 8500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7640G HD 7610M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 108 votes

Rate Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics or Radeon 8500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.