GeForce 610M vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics

Place in performance ranking	915	1118
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.13
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	no data	N13M-GE
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price	$90	$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	656	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	655 / 450 MHz	672 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	Up to 7.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	no data	129.02 gflops
Video decoders	no data	H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and GeForce 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	Up to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	Up to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 API
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1.60
+113%

GeForce 610M 0.75

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms GeForce 610M by 113% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 1583
+212%

GeForce 610M 508

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms GeForce 610M by 212% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics 4981
+125%

GeForce 610M 2210

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics outperforms GeForce 610M by 125% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

36
+125%

16−18

−125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics and GeForce 610M compete in popular games:

HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is 125% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7640G + HD 7610M Dual Graphics is 100% faster than the GeForce 610M.

All in all, in popular games: