ATI Radeon 9600 XT vs HD 7620G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7620G with Radeon 9600 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 7620G
2012
25 Watt
0.85
+963%

HD 7620G outperforms 9600 XT by a whopping 963% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11961529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.620.28
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameDevastatorRV360
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (13 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed360 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed497 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt22 Watt
Texture fill rate11.932.000
Floating-point processing power0.3817 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7620G 0.85
+963%
ATI 9600 XT 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7620G 352
+906%
Samples: 88
ATI 9600 XT 35
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
+1133%
3−4
−1133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
Valorant 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how HD 7620G and ATI 9600 XT compete in popular games:

  • HD 7620G is 1133% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.08
Recency 15 May 2012 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 22 Watt

HD 7620G has a 963% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 XT, on the other hand, has 14% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7620G is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7620G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 51 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7620G or Radeon 9600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.