ATI Radeon X1600 vs HD 7610M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7610M with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.

HD 7610M
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 20 Watt
1.64
+1162%

HD 7610M outperforms ATI X1600 by a whopping 1162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9521436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.630.33
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameWhistlerRV516
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400no data
Core clock speed450 MHz635 MHz
Number of transistors716 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate9.0002.540
Floating-point processing power0.36 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7610M 1.64
+1162%
ATI X1600 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7610M 632
+1190%
ATI X1600 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

This is how HD 7610M and ATI X1600 compete in popular games:

  • HD 7610M is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.64 0.13
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 27 Watt

HD 7610M has a 1161.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7610M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7610M is a notebook card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Radeon HD 7610M
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.