Radeon 880M vs HD 7600G

Place in the ranking	1136	274
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.12	93.66
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	Devastator	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2012 (12 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	512
Core clock speed	320 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	424 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	1,303 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.18	92.80
Floating-point processing power	0.3256 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	24	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.8
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7600G 0.86

Radeon 880M 20.37
+2269%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7600G 330

Radeon 880M 7830
+2273%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7600G 628

Radeon 880M 13892
+2112%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −3500%	36 +3500%
1440p	0−1	22

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −500%	42 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −371%	33 +371%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −957%	74 +957%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −271%	26 +271%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −389%	44 +389%
Fortnite	2−3 −5250%	100−110 +5250%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −800%	63 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1136%	130−140 +1136%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −967%	60−65 +967%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1014%	230−240 +1014%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −200%	21 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −656%	65−70 +656%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −657%	53 +657%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −1136%	130−140 +1136%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
World of Tanks	4−5 −3350%	130−140 +3350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +68.4%	19 −68.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2233%	70−75 +2233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −625%	27−30 +625%
Valorant	5−6 −960%	50−55 +960%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −2950%	60−65 +2950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2150%	45−50 +2150%
Dota 2	14−16 −2233%	350−400 +2233%
Valorant	1−2 −2300%	24−27 +2300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Dota 2	53 +0%	53 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	52 +0%	52 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Valorant	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	22 +0%	22 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Fortnite	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

This is how HD 7600G and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

Radeon 880M is 3500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7600G is 68% faster.
in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 880M is 5250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 7600G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Radeon 880M is ahead in 26 tests (47%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.86	20.37
Recency	1 September 2012	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	32 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	19 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 2268.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7600G in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.