Radeon 740M vs HD 7600G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7600G and Radeon 740M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7600G
2012
19 Watt
0.85

740M outperforms HD 7600G by a whopping 878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1136505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.0737.98
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDevastatorPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed320 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.1840.00
Floating-point processing power0.3256 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7600G 0.85
Radeon 740M 8.31
+878%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7600G 327
Radeon 740M 3204
+880%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7600G 628
Radeon 740M 7490
+1093%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−950%
21
+950%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 20−22
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−90.3%
55−60
+90.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 20−22
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−90.3%
55−60
+90.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 0−1 20−22
Hitman 3 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−314%
27−30
+314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−90.3%
55−60
+90.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 6−7

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD 7600G and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 950% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 740M is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 38 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 8.31
Recency 1 September 2012 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 15 Watt

Radeon 740M has a 877.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7600G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7600G
Radeon HD 7600G
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 88 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 71 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.