Radeon 740M vs HD 7570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7570M with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7570M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 13 Watt
1.07

740M outperforms HD 7570M by a whopping 650% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1123545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.8712.74
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameThamesPhoenix2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480256
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors716 million20,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0044.80
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2416
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7570M 1.07
Radeon 740M 8.02
+650%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7570M 427
Radeon 740M 3192
+648%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7570M 829
Radeon 740M 6932
+736%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7570M 3727
Radeon 740M 24621
+561%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7570M 569
Radeon 740M 4843
+751%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7570M 4623
Radeon 740M 30557
+561%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
−614%
100−110
+614%
Full HD22
+4.8%
21
−4.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Fortnite 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 30−35
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−392%
120−130
+392%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Dota 2 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Fortnite 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 21−24
Metro Exodus 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%
Dead Island 2 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Dota 2 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−467%
30−35
+467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−211%
27−30
+211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−233%
20−22
+233%
Valorant 30−35
−150%
80−85
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 12−14
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
Valorant 1−2
−8800%
85−90
+8800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Far Cry 5 0−1 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Valorant 5−6
−700%
40−45
+700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Dead Island 2 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60
+0%
60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 26
+0%
26
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27
+0%
27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how HD 7570M and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 614% faster in 900p
  • HD 7570M is 5% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 740M is 8800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is ahead in 41 tests (77%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 8.02
Recency 7 January 2012 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 45 Watt

HD 7570M has 246.2% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has a 649.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7570M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7570M is a notebook card while Radeon 740M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Radeon HD 7570M
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 122 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 132 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7570M or Radeon 740M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.