GeForce4 448 Go vs Radeon HD 7570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7570M and GeForce4 448 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


HD 7570M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 13 Watt
1.00
+9900%

HD 7570M outperforms GeForce4 448 Go by a whopping 9900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11581573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.92no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameThamesNV18 A4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2012 (14 years ago)1 March 2002 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed500 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7570M 1.00
+9900%
GeForce4 448 Go 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7570M 417
+8240%
Samples: 591
GeForce4 448 Go 5
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14-0−1
Full HD22-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Valorant 5−6 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.00 0.01
Recency 7 January 2012 1 March 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

HD 7570M has a 9900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7570M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 448 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 123 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7570M or GeForce4 448 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.