GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7560D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7560D with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7560D
2012
65 Watt
1.15

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms HD 7560D by a whopping 1465% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1077313
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency1.2528.29
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed760 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1694.53
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7560D 1.15
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.00
+1465%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7560D 1076
RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+1061%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7560D 4897
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+856%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7560D 791
RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+1033%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7560D 6415
RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+808%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−133%
42
+133%
1440p2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
4K1−2
−2700%
28
+2700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.61no data
1440p50.50no data
4K101.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 59
Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−633%
65−70
+633%
Valorant 30−35
−322%
130−140
+322%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45
−387%
210−220
+387%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Dota 2 16−18
−638%
118
+638%
Far Cry 5 0−1 53
Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 68
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
26
+420%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−633%
65−70
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−729%
58
+729%
Valorant 30−35
−322%
130−140
+322%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Dota 2 16−18
−588%
110
+588%
Far Cry 5 0−1 49
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1100%
70−75
+1100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−280%
19
+280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−633%
65−70
+633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−371%
33
+371%
Valorant 30−35
−322%
130−140
+322%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−1729%
120−130
+1729%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1400%
160−170
+1400%
Valorant 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−825%
37
+825%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Dota 2 0−1 34
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 53
+0%
53
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how HD 7560D and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 2700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 18.00
Recency 2 October 2012 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 1465.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560D is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 147 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2560 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.