GeForce GTX 750 v2 vs Radeon HD 7560D

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1128not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.27no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGM206
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed760 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1188 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.1638.02
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS1.217 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 17 November 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

GTX 750 v2 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560D and GeForce GTX 750 v2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 157 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 67 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or GeForce GTX 750 v2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.