Radeon HD 7560D vs GeForce GTX 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.40
+951%

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking3701027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.390.03
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGK104Trinity
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (10 years ago)26 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $101
Current price$136 (0.5x MSRP)$39 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 760 has 14533% better value for money than HD 7560D.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152256
CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed980 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate94.1 billion/sec12.16
Floating-point performance2,378 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length9.5" (24.1 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+no data
3D Gaming+no data
3D Vision+no data
PhysX+no data
3D Vision Live+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.40
+951%
HD 7560D 1.18

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 760 4793
+951%
HD 7560D 456

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 951% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760 7962
+640%
HD 7560D 1076

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 640% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 760 29073
+494%
HD 7560D 4897

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 494% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760 5959
+653%
HD 7560D 791

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 653% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 760 40150
+526%
HD 7560D 6415

GeForce GTX 760 outperforms Radeon HD 7560D by 526% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+226%
19
−226%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Hitman 3 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Hitman 3 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+800%
3−4
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+1650%
2−3
−1650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Hitman 3 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

This is how GTX 760 and HD 7560D compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 226% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 760 is 2300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 760 surpassed HD 7560D in all 38 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.40 1.18
Recency 25 June 2013 26 September 2012
Cost $249 $101
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GTX 760 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1953 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 129 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.