FirePro V3900 vs Radeon HD 7560D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7560D with FirePro V3900, including specs and performance data.

HD 7560D
2012
65 Watt
1.14

V3900 outperforms HD 7560D by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1066949
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency1.262.30
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteTurks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256480
Core clock speed760 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt199 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1615.60
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS0.624 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7560D 1.14
FirePro V3900 1.60
+40.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7560D 457
FirePro V3900 640
+40%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Fortnite 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
World of Tanks 45
−33.3%
60−65
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Valorant 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 7560D and FirePro V3900 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro V3900 is 24% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 1.60
Recency 2 October 2012 7 February 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 199 Watt

HD 7560D has an age advantage of 7 months, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 206.2% lower power consumption.

FirePro V3900, on the other hand, has a 40.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro V3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560D is a desktop card while FirePro V3900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 145 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 96 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.