Radeon 625 vs HD 7520G

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7520G and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7520G
2012
35 Watt
0.81

625 outperforms HD 7520G by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1154807
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.603.84
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameScrapperPolaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed496 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed685 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.22024.58
Floating-point processing power0.263 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7520G 0.81
Radeon 625 2.78
+243%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7520G 313
Radeon 625 1073
+243%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−239%
95−100
+239%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Valorant 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 30−33
−46.7%
40−45
+46.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

This is how HD 7520G and Radeon 625 compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 is 239% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 533% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 is ahead in 36 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 2.78
Recency 6 June 2012 13 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

HD 7520G has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Radeon 625, on the other hand, has a 243.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G
Radeon HD 7520G
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 96 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 146 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7520G or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.