GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
2012
1.67

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking945274
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Power efficiencyno data27.92
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataTU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7361024
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data95.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1.67
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.28
+1114%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 1621
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+718%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics 3755
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+1059%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−1074%
270−280
+1074%
Full HD16
−269%
59
+269%
1440p3−4
−1333%
43
+1333%
4K2−3
−1150%
25
+1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−367%
42
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Elden Ring 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−300%
36
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−850%
95
+850%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6500%
66
+6500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−529%
44
+529%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−700%
32
+700%
Dota 2 3−4
−2900%
90
+2900%
Elden Ring 2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−483%
70
+483%
Fortnite 8−9
−1238%
100−110
+1238%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−650%
75
+650%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−2433%
76
+2433%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−700%
130−140
+700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−314%
29
+314%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−700%
60−65
+700%
World of Tanks 44
−430%
230−240
+430%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−300%
35−40
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−625%
29
+625%
Dota 2 3−4
−3633%
112
+3633%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−458%
65−70
+458%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−530%
63
+530%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−700%
130−140
+700%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1464%
170−180
+1464%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
World of Tanks 10−11
−1270%
130−140
+1270%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−700%
16
+700%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Valorant 7−8
−643%
50−55
+643%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Elden Ring 0−1 14−16
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1120%
60−65
+1120%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6
+500%
Dota 2 16−18
−225%
52
+225%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Valorant 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant 98
+0%
98
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1074% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 269% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1333% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 6500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 48 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.67 20.28
Recency 15 May 2012 23 April 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 1114.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1717 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.