GeForce 7900 GS vs Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Place in the ranking	946	1193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	no data	0.93
Architecture	Terascale 3 (2010−2013)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	no data	G71
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2012 (12 years ago)	1 May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$259

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	736	no data
Core clock speed	655 / 600 MHz	450 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	278 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	49 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	9.000
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	no data	198 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	660 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	42.24 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	no data	3.0
OpenGL	no data	2.1
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	23 +156%	9−10 −156%
Full HD	16 +167%	6−7 −167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

43.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Fortnite	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
World of Tanks	44 +175%	16−18 −175%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Dota 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
World of Tanks	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +158%	12−14 −158%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Valorant	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Dota 2	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Valorant	2−3	0−1

This is how HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics and 7900 GS compete in popular games:

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 156% faster in 900p
HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is 167% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.67	0.66
Recency	15 May 2012	1 May 2006
Chip lithography	40 nm	90 nm

HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics has a 153% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while GeForce 7900 GS is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.