GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 7500G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

HD 7500G
2012
17 Watt
0.79

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by a whopping 5201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking110982
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTrinityGN20-E6
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$338 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2565888
Core clock speed327 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed424 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate6.784248.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7500G and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7500G 0.79
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 41.88
+5201%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by 5201% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7500G 585
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 36970
+6220%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by 6220% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7500G 2405
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 81895
+3306%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by 3306% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7500G 512
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 27776
+5325%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by 5325% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7500G 4333
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 141689
+3170%

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon HD 7500G by 3170% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5600%
114
+5600%
1440p1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%
4K0−148

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4200%
129
+4200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3600%
111
+3600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−5533%
169
+5533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 95−100
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2722%
254
+2722%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 95−100
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1711%
163
+1711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6167%
188
+6167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4100%
120−130
+4100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3333%
103
+3333%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 95−100

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 80−85
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 95−100

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9900%
100
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 85−90
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2200%
90−95
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

This is how HD 7500G and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 5600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 6900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 9900% faster than the HD 7500G.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Ti Mobile surpassed HD 7500G in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 41.88
Recency 15 May 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount System Shared 8 GB
Chip lithography 32 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G
Radeon HD 7500G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 63 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 769 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.