Radeon Pro W6600 vs HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics with Radeon Pro W6600, including specs and performance data.
Pro W6600 outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 3245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1059 | 105 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 71.48 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 27.59 |
| Architecture | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | no data | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (12 years ago) | 8 June 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 736 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 655 / 600 MHz | 2331 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2903 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 325.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 10.4 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 241 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12.0 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Elden Ring | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−3150%
|
260−270
+3150%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−3233%
|
200−210
+3233%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Elden Ring | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−2900%
|
300−310
+2900%
|
| Fortnite | 5−6
−3100%
|
160−170
+3100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−3150%
|
260−270
+3150%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−2977%
|
400−450
+2977%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−3233%
|
200−210
+3233%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| World of Tanks | 24−27
−3169%
|
850−900
+3169%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−2900%
|
300−310
+2900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−3150%
|
260−270
+3150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−2977%
|
400−450
+2977%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−3186%
|
230−240
+3186%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 6−7
−3233%
|
200−210
+3233%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−3181%
|
1050−1100
+3181%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3233%
|
100−105
+3233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−3100%
|
160−170
+3100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−3233%
|
200−210
+3233%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−3025%
|
500−550
+3025%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−3233%
|
500−550
+3233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−3233%
|
100−105
+3233%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−3233%
|
500−550
+3233%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−3025%
|
500−550
+3025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.20 | 40.14 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 8 June 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 7 nm |
Pro W6600 has a 3245% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
