RTX A5000 Mobile vs Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics with RTX A5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
2012
1.18

RTX A5000 Mobile outperforms HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics by a whopping 3376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.20
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameno dataGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7366144
Core clock speed655 / 600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data302.4
Floating-point processing powerno data19.35 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3500%
108
+3500%
1440p2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3800%
110−120
+3800%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3800%
110−120
+3800%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−13100%
130−140
+13100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
Valorant 30−35
−585%
220−230
+585%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−3800%
110−120
+3800%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−13100%
130−140
+13100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−930%
270−280
+930%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Dota 2 16−18
−725%
132
+725%
Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 122
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2900%
150
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−585%
220−230
+585%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−13100%
130−140
+13100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2933%
90−95
+2933%
Dota 2 16−18
−675%
124
+675%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1600%
150−160
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1700%
90
+1700%
Valorant 30−35
−585%
220−230
+585%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4350%
260−270
+4350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
Valorant 3−4
−8467%
250−260
+8467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7800%
79
+7800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−5050%
100−110
+5050%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−407%
76
+407%
Valorant 6−7
−3833%
230−240
+3833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Dota 2 0−1 107
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2450%
50−55
+2450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics and RTX A5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 3500% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 3450% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 4900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 13100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is ahead in 47 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 41.02
Recency 15 May 2012 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm

RTX A5000 Mobile has a 3376.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics is a notebook graphics card while RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7500G HD 7550M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 56 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics or RTX A5000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.