RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon HD 7470M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7470M with RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD 7470M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 7 Watt
0.97

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD 7470M by a whopping 4735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking115781
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.6436.02
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSeymourAD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2012 (13 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1605120
Core clock speed750 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors370 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate6.400247.2
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS15.82 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache16 KB5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7470M 0.97
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 46.90
+4735%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7470M 407
Samples: 4
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 19613
+4719%
Samples: 620

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7470M 522
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 41630
+7875%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7470M 440
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile 29248
+6547%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−4700%
1200−1250
+4700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Dota 2 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Dota 2 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Valorant 30−35
−4577%
1450−1500
+4577%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Valorant 5−6
−4700%
240−250
+4700%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 46.90
Recency 7 January 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 100 Watt

HD 7470M has 1328.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4735.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7470M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7470M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7470M
Radeon HD 7470M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 120 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 45 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7470M or RTX 3500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.