GeForce GT 340 OEM vs Radeon HD 7420G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGT215
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)2 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12896
Core clock speed480 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed655 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt69 Watt
Texture fill rate5.24017.60
Floating-point processing power0.1677 TFLOPS0.2573 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared850 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data27.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 2 February 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 69 Watt

HD 7420G has an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 97.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7420G and GeForce GT 340 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7420G is a notebook card while GeForce GT 340 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Radeon HD 7420G
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
GeForce GT 340 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 32 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7420G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 33 votes

Rate GeForce GT 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.