GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1143not rated
Place by popularity69not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeC89
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$476 $180

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1248
Core clock speed350 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors995 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown23 Watt
Texture fill rate13.807.200
Floating-point performance20.4 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce 320M Mac Edition compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 February 2011 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce 320M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce 320M Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
GeForce 320M Mac Edition

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2132 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate GeForce 320M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.