Radeon Pro W6400 vs HD 7340
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 7340 with Radeon Pro W6400, including specs and performance data.
Pro W6400 outperforms HD 7340 by a whopping 5084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1309 | 303 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.57 | 29.22 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Loveland | Navi 24 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 June 2012 (13 years ago) | 19 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $552.69 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 2331 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 680 MHz | 2331 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 450 million | 5,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.184 | 111.9 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08368 TFLOPS | 3.58 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | 48 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Width | IGP | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−4900%
|
200−210
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−4900%
|
1300−1350
+4900%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−4900%
|
750−800
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−4900%
|
200−210
+4900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−4900%
|
250−260
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−4900%
|
1300−1350
+4900%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−4900%
|
200−210
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−4900%
|
250−260
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−4900%
|
1300−1350
+4900%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−4900%
|
200−210
+4900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−4900%
|
750−800
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 19.18 |
| Recency | 6 June 2012 | 19 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 50 Watt |
HD 7340 has 177.8% lower power consumption.
Pro W6400, on the other hand, has a 5083.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7340 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
