ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT vs HD 7310

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7310 and Radeon HD 2600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


HD 7310
2012
18 Watt
0.31

HD 2600 XT outperforms HD 7310 by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13871240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiency1.331.15
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameLovelandRV630
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80120
Core clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors450 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0006.400
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.192 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7310 0.31
ATI HD 2600 XT 0.67
+116%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7310 128
Samples: 790
ATI HD 2600 XT 282
+120%
Samples: 474

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−112%
55−60
+112%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−112%
55−60
+112%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Dota 2 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−100%
14−16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Valorant 24−27
−112%
55−60
+112%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Valorant 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.67
Recency 6 June 2012 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

HD 7310 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 2600 XT, on the other hand, has a 116% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 2600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7310 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 186 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or Radeon HD 2600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.