GeForce2 MX vs Radeon HD 7310

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13811600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameLovelandNV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed500 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors450 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.0000.7
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7310 128
+6300%
Samples: 790
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2012 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 7310 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7310 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 179 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7310 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.