GeForce2 MX vs Radeon HD 7970

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3951546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.12no data
Power efficiency3.73no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameTahitiNV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date22 December 2011 (13 years ago)28 June 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speedno data175 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,313 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate118.40.7
Floating-point processing power3.789 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length274 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x VGA
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 117.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7970 5248
+262300%
GeForce2 MX 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p105no data
Full HD93no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 212 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2011 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

HD 7970 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7970 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7970
Radeon HD 7970
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 310 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 17 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7970 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.