Arc A770 vs Radeon HD 7310

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7310 and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7310
2012
18 Watt
0.33

Arc A770 outperforms HD 7310 by a whopping 10185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1303155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.32
Power efficiency1.2610.33
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameLovelandDG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804096
Core clock speed500 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors450 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000614.4
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7310 0.33
Arc A770 33.94
+10185%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7310 128
Arc A770 13077
+10116%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7310 260
Arc A770 41303
+15786%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7310 640
Arc A770 103295
+16052%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7310 192
Arc A770 32666
+16914%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 7310 1593
Arc A770 139166
+8636%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−11500%
116
+11500%
1440p0−165
4K-0−141

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data5.06
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2067%
65
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1375%
110−120
+1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2100%
85−90
+2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−275%
100−110
+275%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−933%
31
+933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1375%
110−120
+1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6350%
258
+6350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−522%
55−60
+522%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−275%
100−110
+275%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1400%
45
+1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2550%
50−55
+2550%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1413%
121
+1413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5300%
216
+5300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−700%
72
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−164%
74
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 16−18
Hitman 3 6−7
−417%
30−35
+417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4900%
100
+4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 38
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 91
+0%
91
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+0%
158
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 83
+0%
83
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 89
+0%
89
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
+0%
37
+0%

This is how HD 7310 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 11500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 6350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 33.94
Recency 6 June 2012 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 225 Watt

HD 7310 has 1150% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 10184.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7310
Radeon HD 7310
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6
170 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8
5287 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.