AMD Radeon HD 7290 vs ATI Xpress 1100
Comparison of Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
1 July 2011
1 June 2006
Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
DirectX 9b, Shader 2.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
HD 7290 140 +311.8%
ATI Xpress 1100 34
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 7290
Much newer (1 July 2011 vs 1 June 2006)
More pipelines (80 vs 4)
Finer manufacturing process technology (40 vs 110 nm)
Turbo Core 400MHz
Advantages of ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
We are unaware of any advantages of ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 over AMD Radeon HD 7290.
So, HD 7290 or Xpress 1100?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon HD 7290 and ATI Radeon Xpress 1100. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon Xpress 1100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.