ATI Radeon IGP 350M vs HD 7290

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7290 and Radeon IGP 350M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7290
2012
18 Watt
0.28
+2700%

HD 7290 outperforms ATI IGP 350M by a whopping 2700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13471506
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameLovelandRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 June 2012 (12 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed400 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2000.37
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7290 0.28
+2700%
ATI IGP 350M 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7290 111
+1750%
ATI IGP 350M 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 12−14 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Valorant 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16 0−1
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.01
Recency 6 June 2012 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 7290 has a 2700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 7290 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 350M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7290
Radeon HD 7290
ATI Radeon IGP 350M
Radeon IGP 350M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7290 or Radeon IGP 350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.