GeForce FX 5600 vs Radeon HD 7290

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7290 with GeForce FX 5600, including specs and performance data.

HD 7290
2012
18 Watt
0.25
+733%

HD 7290 outperforms 5600 by a whopping 733% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14011546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.120.07
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameLovelandNV31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (13 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed400 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001.300
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7290 0.25
+733%
FX 5600 0.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7290 111
+825%
Samples: 122
FX 5600 12
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+767%
3−4
−767%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.03
Recency 6 June 2012 6 March 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 37 Watt

HD 7290 has a 733.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 105.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 7290 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7290 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7290
Radeon HD 7290
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600
GeForce FX 5600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7290 or GeForce FX 5600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.