Radeon HD 6970M vs HD 6990M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

HD 6990M
2011
2048 MB GDDR5
5.23

HD 6970M outperforms HD 6990M by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking578556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.041.92
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBlackcomb XTXBlackcomb XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 July 2011 (12 years old)6 January 2011 (13 years old)
Current price$190 $257
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6990M has 6% better value for money than HD 6970M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120960
Core clock speed715 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75-100 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0432.64
Floating-point performance1,601.6 gflops1,305.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6990M and Radeon HD 6970M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6990M 5.23
HD 6970M 5.86
+12%

HD 6970M outperforms HD 6990M by 12% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6990M 15113
+27%
HD 6970M 11898

HD 6990M outperforms HD 6970M by 27% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6990M 3227
+14.5%
HD 6970M 2819

HD 6990M outperforms HD 6970M by 14% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p54
+3.8%
52
−3.8%
Full HD60
+17.6%
51
−17.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−18.2%
12−14
+18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

This is how HD 6990M and HD 6970M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • HD 6990M is 3.8% faster than HD 6970M

1080p resolution:

  • HD 6990M is 17.6% faster than HD 6970M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6970M is 200% faster than the HD 6990M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970M is ahead in 53 tests (84%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (16%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 5.23 5.86
Recency 12 July 2011 6 January 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon HD 6970M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
AMD Radeon HD 6970M
Radeon HD 6970M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 92 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 6970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.