GeForce 6100 vs Radeon HD 6990M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6990M with GeForce 6100, including specs and performance data.

HD 6990M
2011
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.62
+7600%

HD 6990M outperforms 6100 by a whopping 7600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6911534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.58no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameBlackcombC51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 July 2011 (14 years ago)11 October 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1120no data
Core clock speed715 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate40.040.43
Floating-point processing power1.602 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs561
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p540−1
Full HD600−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+8100%
1−2
−8100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 40−45 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Valorant 24−27 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.62 0.06
Recency 12 July 2011 11 October 2004
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

HD 6990M has a 7600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6990M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6990M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6990M
Radeon HD 6990M
NVIDIA GeForce 6100
GeForce 6100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6990M or GeForce 6100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.