GeForce 920MX vs Radeon HD 6970

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6970 with GeForce 920MX, including specs and performance data.

HD 6970
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 550 Watt
7.29
+164%

HD 6970 outperforms 920MX by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking545805
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency2.0412.05
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameCaymanGM108
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (14 years ago)25 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536256
Core clock speedno data965 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt16 Watt
Texture fill rate84.4823.83
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS0.5084 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
GPU Boostno data2.0
Optimus-+
GameWorks-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6970 7.29
+164%
GeForce 920MX 2.76

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6970 2838
+164%
GeForce 920MX 1074

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 6970 3470
+140%
GeForce 920MX 1448

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+150%
18
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Fortnite 40−45
+100%
21
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Valorant 75−80
+70.5%
40−45
−70.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+124%
50−55
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 50−55
+50%
36
−50%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Fortnite 40−45
+180%
15
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+317%
6
−317%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Valorant 75−80
+70.5%
40−45
−70.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 50−55
+58.8%
34
−58.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Valorant 75−80
+70.5%
40−45
−70.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+282%
11
−282%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+179%
18−20
−179%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
Valorant 75−80
+229%
24−27
−229%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD 6970 and GeForce 920MX compete in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is 150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD 6970 is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 6970 is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.29 2.76
Recency 14 December 2010 25 March 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 16 Watt

HD 6970 has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score.

GeForce 920MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3337.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon HD 6970 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920MX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6970 is a desktop card while GeForce 920MX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6970
Radeon HD 6970
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GeForce 920MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1088 votes

Rate GeForce 920MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6970 or GeForce 920MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.