Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs HD 6950M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6950M with Radeon RX 6750 GRE, including specs and performance data.

HD 6950M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.57

RX 6750 GRE outperforms HD 6950M by a whopping 1284% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking72164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.41
Power efficiency4.9013.56
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBlackcombNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9602560
Core clock speed580 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate27.84413.0
Floating-point processing power1.114 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3264
TMUs48160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1241%
550−600
+1241%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1241%
550−600
+1241%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−1257%
190−200
+1257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−1241%
550−600
+1241%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−1264%
300−310
+1264%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1257%
95−100
+1257%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 49.40
Recency 4 January 2011 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 250 Watt

HD 6950M has 400% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 1283.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6950M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6950M
Radeon HD 6950M
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE
Radeon RX 6750 GRE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 228 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.