Radeon PRO W7700 vs HD 6930

Place in the ranking	536	61
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.00	57.46
Power efficiency	2.86	19.25
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Cayman	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 December 2011 (12 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$180	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 2773% better value for money than HD 6930.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	3072
Core clock speed	750 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	60.00	499.2
Floating-point processing power	1.92 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	96
TMUs	80	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	220 mm	241 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.25	49.85
Recency	1 December 2011	13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	186 Watt	190 Watt

HD 6930 has 2.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 587.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.