Radeon 610M vs HD 6930
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6930 with Radeon 610M, including specs and performance data.
HD 6930 outperforms Radeon 610M by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 512 | 753 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 38 |
Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | RDNA 2 (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Cayman | RDNA 2 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 December 2011 (12 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | no data |
Current price | $11.99 (0.1x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1280 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 2,640 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 186 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 60.00 | 15.20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,920.0 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 6930 and Radeon 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 220 mm | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
HDMI | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.7 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
HD 6930 outperforms 610M by 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
HD 6930 outperforms 610M by 131% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 35−40
+150%
| 14
−150%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+150%
|
12−14
−150%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
+137%
|
18−20
−137%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
+135%
|
17
−135%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+150%
|
12−14
−150%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
+137%
|
18−20
−137%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+125%
|
8
−125%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 35−40
+150%
|
14
−150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+145%
|
11
−145%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−33
+150%
|
12−14
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 45−50
+137%
|
18−20
−137%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
+140%
|
10
−140%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+129%
|
7
−129%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 40−45
+150%
|
16−18
−150%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+125%
|
8−9
−125%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+129%
|
7−8
−129%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+133%
|
6−7
−133%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
This is how HD 6930 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:
- HD 6930 is 150% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 7.20 | 2.85 |
Recency | 1 December 2011 | 20 September 2022 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 186 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Radeon HD 6930 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 610M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6930 is a desktop card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.