GeForce 7800 GTX 512 vs Radeon HD 6850M
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 854 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.13 | no data |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | Granville Pro/LP | G70 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 14 November 2005 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $649 |
| Current price | $338 | $250 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 800 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 575 / 675 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,040 million | 302 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 13.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,080.0 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon HD 6850M and GeForce 7800 GTX 512 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 228 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 54.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & Cons Summary
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 14 November 2005 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 108 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6850M and GeForce 7800 GTX 512. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6850M is a notebook card while GeForce 7800 GTX 512 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
