GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5850 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5850
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.91

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 1101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking910249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.08
Power efficiency4.3826.31
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBroadwayTU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8001536
Core clock speed500 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1335 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00128.2
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS4.101 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI Mobility HD 5850 1.91
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.93
+1101%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI Mobility HD 5850 5592
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 31845
+470%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Full HD23
−239%
78
+239%
4K2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.94
4Kno data6.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2267%
70−75
+2267%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1050%
92
+1050%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2733%
85
+2733%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Dota 2 4−5
−2125%
89
+2125%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−377%
62
+377%
Fortnite 9−10
−1200%
110−120
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−2075%
87
+2075%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−805%
172
+805%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−375%
38
+375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−813%
70−75
+813%
World of Tanks 35−40
−570%
240−250
+570%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2267%
70−75
+2267%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−320%
40−45
+320%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−820%
45−50
+820%
Dota 2 4−5
−2050%
86
+2050%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−800%
117
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−800%
95−100
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−679%
140−150
+679%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1238%
170−180
+1238%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
World of Tanks 12−14
−1175%
150−160
+1175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−533%
18−20
+533%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−560%
30−35
+560%
Valorant 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Dota 2 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Dota 2 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Fortnite 0−1 27−30
Valorant 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 102
+0%
102
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 63
+0%
63
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 93
+0%
93
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5850 and GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1058% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 239% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 3950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 49 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 22.93
Recency 7 January 2010 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5850 has 100% lower power consumption.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1100.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 558 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.