Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 vs HD 6850 X2
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6850 X2 and Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD 6850 X2 outperforms HD 6450 GDDR5 by a whopping 585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 577 | 1127 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.78 | 2.44 |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | Barts | Caicos |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 19 September 2011 (13 years ago) | 18 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 960 ×2 | 160 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,700 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 254 Watt | 27 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 ×2 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 1.536 TFLOPS ×2 | no data |
ROPs | 32 ×2 | no data |
TMUs | 48 ×2 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB ×2 | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit ×2 | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB/s ×2 | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 45−50
+543%
| 7
−543%
|
Full HD | 100−110
+567%
| 15
−567%
|
1200p | 30−35
+500%
| 5
−500%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Atomic Heart | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD 6850 X2 and HD 6450 GDDR5 compete in popular games:
- HD 6850 X2 is 543% faster in 900p
- HD 6850 X2 is 567% faster in 1080p
- HD 6850 X2 is 500% faster in 1200p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 6.44 | 0.94 |
Recency | 19 September 2011 | 18 April 2011 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Power consumption (TDP) | 254 Watt | 27 Watt |
HD 6850 X2 has a 585.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
HD 6450 GDDR5, on the other hand, has 840.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon HD 6850 X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.