GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs Radeon HD 6790

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6790 and GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6790
2011, $149
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
3.74

RTX 2060 12 GB outperforms HD 6790 by a whopping 918% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking757133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.70no data
Power efficiency1.9215.92
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBartsTU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 April 2011 (14 years ago)7 December 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002176
Core clock speed840 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt184 Watt
Texture fill rate33.60224.4
Floating-point processing power1.344 TFLOPS7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs40136
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data34
L1 Cache160 KB2.1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6790 3.74
RTX 2060 12 GB 38.08
+918%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6790 1567
Samples: 883
RTX 2060 12 GB 15933
+917%
Samples: 1231

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p52
−862%
500−550
+862%
Full HD61
−884%
600−650
+884%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.44no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Fortnite 21−24
−900%
220−230
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−900%
180−190
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
Valorant 50−55
−843%
500−550
+843%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−856%
650−700
+856%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Dota 2 30−35
−782%
300−310
+782%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Fortnite 21−24
−900%
220−230
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−900%
180−190
+900%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Valorant 50−55
−843%
500−550
+843%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Dota 2 30−35
−782%
300−310
+782%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−900%
180−190
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−900%
160−170
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Valorant 50−55
−843%
500−550
+843%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−900%
220−230
+900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−900%
80−85
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−900%
290−300
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−868%
300−310
+868%
Valorant 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−900%
90−95
+900%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−900%
50−55
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−900%
70−75
+900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−900%
150−160
+900%
Valorant 18−20
−900%
190−200
+900%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Dota 2 12−14
−900%
120−130
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

This is how HD 6790 and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 12 GB is 862% faster in 900p
  • RTX 2060 12 GB is 884% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.74 38.08
Recency 4 April 2011 7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 184 Watt

HD 6790 has 22.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 918.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6790 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 6790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 159 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6790 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1354 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6790 or GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.