Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon HD 6770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6770M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 6770M
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.50

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms HD 6770M by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking796501
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameWhistler-XTTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$243 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48080
Core clock speed675 / 725 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate17.40no data
Floating-point performance696.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 6770M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 6770M 2.50
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.45
+198%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770M by 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6770M 1328
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 5310
+300%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770M by 300% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 6770M 6107
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+256%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770M by 256% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 6770M 980
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 3987
+307%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms Radeon HD 6770M by 307% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p23
−183%
65−70
+183%
Full HD22
+22.2%
18
−22.2%
1200p12
−192%
35−40
+192%
1440p3−4
−233%
10
+233%
4K5−6
−200%
15
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 3−4 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
−189%
55−60
+189%
Metro Exodus 38
−189%
110−120
+189%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
Metro Exodus 25
−180%
70−75
+180%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−181%
45−50
+181%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%

This is how HD 6770M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 183% faster in 900p
  • HD 6770M is 22% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 192% faster in 1200p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 233% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.50 7.45
Recency 4 January 2011 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6770M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Radeon HD 6770M
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 79 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 818 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.